<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Daniel Nilson Nunes Nicomedes</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Laureana Moreira Mota</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rebecca Vasconcellos</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nathanael Vieira Medrado</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michelle de Oliveira</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Érika Costa de Alvarenga</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Karyne R.C. Juste</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ariete Righi</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sara Matte Manhabosco</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Guilherme Jorge Brigolini Silva</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fernando Gabriel S. Araújo</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">de Oliveira, Alan Barros</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ronaldo Junio Campos Batista</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jaqueline dos Santos Soares</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Taíse Matte Manhabosco</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Comparison between hydroxyapatite/soapstone and hydroxyapatite/reduced graphene oxide composite coatings: Synthesis and property improvement</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Biocompatibility</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hydroxyapatite</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pulsed electrodeposition</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">rGO</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Soapstone talc</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2021</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175161612100299X</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">121</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">104618</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Economic viability and eco-friendliness are important characteristics that make implants available to the population in a sustainable way. In this work, we evaluate the performance of a low-cost, widely available, and eco-friendly material (talc from soapstone) relative to reduced graphene oxide as reinforcement to brittle hydroxyapatite coatings. We employ a low-cost and straightforward technique, electrodeposition, to deposit the composite coatings on the titanium substrate. Corrosion, wear, and biocompatibility tests indicate that the reduced graphene oxide can be effectively replaced by talc without reducing the mechanical, anticorrosion, and biocompatible composite coatings properties. Our results indicate that talc from soapstone is a promising material for biomedical applications.</style></abstract></record></records></xml>